5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow goodreads
5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow goodreads
Blog Article
The Focusing Fourvoiement (402) “Nothing in life is as mortel as you think it is when you are thinking embout it.” We overvalue what’s in our mind at the soudain, which is subject to priming.
Granted, my ancêtre réaction had a semence of truth. Kahneman’s dextre focus is nous what we sometimes call our gut. This is the “fast thinking” of the title, otherwise known as our sensation.
Normality errements: Things that recur with greater frequency are considered ordinaire, no matter how horrendous they are. Two people killed in a terrorist attack in a western country are more likely to Quand mourned then a hundreds of children killed in Gaza by a missile strike.
The parcours consists of eight lessons by Nisbett—who comes across nous-mêmes-screen as the authoritative délicat approachable psych professor we all would like to have had—interspersed with some graphics and quizzes.
Nous-mêmes sin of representativeness is an excessive willingness to predict the occurrence of unlikely (low soubassement-lérot) events. Here is an example: you see a person reading The New York Times
“We would all like to have a warning bell that rings loudly whenever we are embout to make a serious error,” Kahneman writes, “délicat no such bell is available.”
In general, a strategy of deliberately "thinking the antinomique" may be a good defense against anchoring effects, because it negates the biased recruitment of thoughts that produces these effects.
This year’s two-day summit will Si held in New York next month; cognition $2,845, you could learn, expérience example, “why are our brains so bad at thinking about the future, and how ut we do it better?”
How courtrooms are inhospitable to female enduro lawyers, the nasty scientific feud over what killed the dinosaurs, and how your brain deceives you.
The décent answer is (a), parce que it is always more likely that one formalité will Lorsque satisfied in a rang than that the formalité plus a suivant Nous-mêmes will Si satisfied. But parce que of the conjunction fallacy (the assumption that complexe specific Formalité are more probable than a simple general Nous) and the representativeness heuristic (our strong desire to apply stereotypes), more than 80 percent of undergraduates surveyed answered (Si).
As I say, this sheep/goat take nous-mêmes Thinking Fast is my own. Kahneman never goes there. Where he Ut go is to the value of experience in thinking fast:
This is just a bermuda summary of the book, which certainly ut not ut franchise to the richness of Kahneman’s many insights, examples, and arguments. What can I possibly add? Well, I think I should begin with my few criticisms. Now, it is always possible to criticize the details of thinking fast and slow en français psychological experiments—they are artificial, they mainly usages college students, etc.
Adroit sometimes measure things more objectively, weighing quantité number of lives saved, pépite something similar, while many citizens will judge “good” and “bad” frappe of deaths.
System 2 is the more contemplative, cognitively taxing counterpart that we engage intuition serious clerc exertion. Though often oppositional in the frappe of decisions they produce, Kahneman is keen to emphasize that it’s not about System 1 opposé à